![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() So the question remains why the different part numbers? I'll have to look closely at mine again to see what minor differences may be present. * Edit - I just checked the UK website accessory page and now both parts are listed as 5/64 narrow hemmers. For now, they are all in a pool used interchangeably for all my Singer low shanks. Your list for the part numbers for the different models is very helpful and when I have some time I may separate out my attachments for each machine. One would probably have to very closely examine the different feet to see if they are exact - but if so why the different part numbers? What I find interesting is that the 120855 listed for the 15-91 which threads R to L works perfectly on my Singer 101 which threads L-R. I have not measure or compared the two but the end results look the same to me so for me they are interchangeable. Thanks for all the info Janey - it's so interesting how one thing leads to another as we explore.Īll I remember when I did the research some time ago was that the UK website was not consistent and the accessory page listed different information - maybe this was in error? View Member Profile Send Email Find Member's Topics Find Member's Posts Chaly ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |